[egner64]

Hi there!
Next to Adobe's LR Downloader Pro plays a significant role in my digital photos workstream.
However there is one point: I find the accuracy of geonames.org unaccurate and therefore recode the location using MS ProPhoto Tools 2 which provides much better results.
Question: Is there a way to include Live Local instead of geonames.org for providing location information?
Thanks and regards
Thomas

[Chris Breeze]

Sorry, Downloader Pro only supports the free geonames service at the moment.

[tzphotos.com]

Hi there!
Next to Adobe's LR Downloader Pro plays a significant role in my digital photos workstream.
However there is one point: I find the accuracy of geonames.org unaccurate and therefore recode the location using MS ProPhoto Tools 2 which provides much better results.
Question: Is there a way to include Live Local instead of geonames.org for providing location information?
Thanks and regards
Thomas

I have to agree with you. geonames.org comes up with some strange results. Many times it is a neighborhood name instead of the name of the actual city. I have also seen it use the name of the park instead of the city name.

It would be nice to have an alternative service to supply the info.

[egner64]

Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply. Do you think of adding alternative reverse geocoders as possible e.g. in GPS PhotoLinker/MAC?
Thx Thomas