Box Brownie
May 5th, 2005, 01:07 PM
Hi All
I am delighted that DNG3.1 has arrived as I have delayed until now using RAW on my 350D but have just run a simple test and have noted the following, which I know may be like comparing apples and oranges but wondered why the following is happening.
I ran a convert on a couple of RAWs and had a look at both the original .cr2 and dng files with BreezeBrowserPro:-
Firstly, the dng file appears to have had some sharpening and/or contrast adjustment made as part of the conversion.
Secondly, the conversion has stripped a lost of the metadata e.g. the focus point information.
I would welcome any thoughts, comments or observations as to what I have noticed as I was hoping that the DNG route to handling my RAWs in the PSCS environment would be the best setup until I could justify the upgrade to PSCS2.
:)
I am delighted that DNG3.1 has arrived as I have delayed until now using RAW on my 350D but have just run a simple test and have noted the following, which I know may be like comparing apples and oranges but wondered why the following is happening.
I ran a convert on a couple of RAWs and had a look at both the original .cr2 and dng files with BreezeBrowserPro:-
Firstly, the dng file appears to have had some sharpening and/or contrast adjustment made as part of the conversion.
Secondly, the conversion has stripped a lost of the metadata e.g. the focus point information.
I would welcome any thoughts, comments or observations as to what I have noticed as I was hoping that the DNG route to handling my RAWs in the PSCS environment would be the best setup until I could justify the upgrade to PSCS2.
:)